0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: JFax on February 18, 2015, 02:24:47 AM1.75? Nah, too thin. 1.95 as a minimum. But 2.1 front and back is a good standard I think.I dont think the inflation diameter has that big of an impact of me riding. But I wonder, is there like a standard or norm to what tyre size to use when measuring frame geometry, like BB height?From what I've seen they assume the tire size is 20''. So for BB height it's 10'' plus the rise above axle line. It would, in my opinion, be better/more correct/make more sense to measure BB height from the axle line and not from the "ground".
1.75? Nah, too thin. 1.95 as a minimum. But 2.1 front and back is a good standard I think.I dont think the inflation diameter has that big of an impact of me riding. But I wonder, is there like a standard or norm to what tyre size to use when measuring frame geometry, like BB height?
He is so good that he probably doesnt have a serial number on his frame, just a cheat code...