The argument doesn't make any sense. The two things being compared are completely different and unrelated. It makes it seem as though there is a housing shortage and the homeless vets are competing with the refugees for a limited number of houses. It ignores the fact that most homeless vets are so because war has fucked with their minds to the point that they can't function in normal society and do all the thing people need to do to maintain a home. Sure, the VA has let a lot of vets down in terms of care for their mental health problems but that has nothing to do with the US taking in refugees from Syria.
what if the refugees are [homeless, flawed] vets themselves?
etc...
the past couple of days I've been thinking about the massive tunnel bomb videos that came out over the past two years or so. Would a drugged out islamist would-be bomber be ok with being down in the paris catacombs with the walls lined with dead christians/jews... or would it be like hell for them?
and what would happen if they sneak explosives underneath the vatican?